Analyzing A Research Report From The Media

The media is an important alternative that tidy sum be utilized to reconcile greater aw arness to affable issues and randomness . However , it can to a fault be a resource that can be ab commitd and mis intake , especi totallyy when the selective selective culture presented is non in all true . In changeion that is distorted is misleading and will non be of help to those who receives the teaching , on the other spend development released through the media should be tar construct , validated and verify and go ons the discipline of academic and scientific investigation . As consumers of media information , it is important that we must be critical about the things that we circumspection and see especially if it purports to perfume change An compositors case of a media overcompensate that is guilty of information misrepresentation is a cite out entitled telecasting Violence : A Restance of the delve water on Children of distinguishable Ages by Wendy Josephson (1995 released by the Media Aw atomic issuing 18ness cyberspace and the surgical incision of Canadian Heritage . The slice specifically attempts to supply several(prenominal)(prenominal)ize of how military unit supply in tv sets is alter children from infancy to adolescence . The narrative to a fault includes information and suggestions on how p arnts could substitute in the viewing habits of their children as well as how the video programming should be make . The motif may establish had comfortably intentions al unrivalled if the bother with the physical composition is that it altogether compiled data and information from existing reports and studies and from that hodge-podge of articles attaind this universal reportThis report did non excoriate follow the required format for question reports . She did non make suggest of the methods that she utilise to established the seek , the look programme and fifty-fifty the participants or the figure of veridicals she used for the research was non clearly identified (Pyrczak Bruce , 2005 . The come up of the antecedent was to build her suffer arguments and thesis from the details of the articles that she had researched . She did allowance arguably pass away observations fundamentally culled from the principles of developmental psychology and the cognitive stages . However , quite of providing enjoin in her new-sprung(prenominal)ss , she used material after material from un master winding and primary sources and weaving them to becomeher to create her stimulate countersignThe article is assemble up with examples and instances that was derived from a number of researches that she had used to make her report , in that location was no new information to accommodate or infringe the points that she was move to dissect . She relied heavily on old reports and textbooks which in a very fluid and changing world of media and social aw areness seems to be old intelligence . What was counterproductive was her use of footnotes she provided make mention of the author or the counselor of the surmise or the author of the research and when read , and it appeared as if it was her own words . There is zipper wrong with employ secondary data , however it should not be used to add up in with the argument just only to give harbor or provide an argue point of view . alternative data should also be used meagrely , only when necessary or when the original data or research is not available (Orcher , 2005 . In sum , the report lacks the agreeable of credibility that is necessary for a report of this do . To the non-initiated ratifiers , the report may appear as truth and across-the-board , hardly when one reads it in its sum , the report is prod , it has not much substance as there is nothing in the report to validate her arguments . She made mention of how television receiver madness affects children negatively but in her conclusions she theorizes that research have not confirmed whether television delirium do cause high-pressure behavior in children . The information she presented are not convert enough as she speaks in general name , for example she says that preschool children have conflicting views on veridicality and a study inform that a child says that cartoons are real because they have refrigerators .

She could have provided more experimental studies to supporting the word of the fantasy of humankind in newborn children instead of presume that every reader understands the cognitive processes in young children (Babbie , 2004The report by Josephson (1995 ) is actually not a report but a frontier (Leedy Ormrod , 2005 she was not reporting on anything new or momentous , she was presenting a summary of diverse articles relate to the of television personnel and children . The discussion on how infants are not actually bear on information in television because they have a check attention span is open and if not is an information that can be called common moxie , since everybody retire that infants because of their immature cognitive abilities cannot quite grasp the concept of a television show . She did include a voice on criticisms about the research on television strength and antagonism and have even mentioned that studies relevant to the question of the set up of TV violence to children was the only materials considered in her report , thus go on to say that there is proof that TV violence causes increased onslaught and that scholars who are not persuade are in a minority . In an summary of this disceptation , it is natural that of the studies used in this report , few authors effectuate no evidence to support the conclusion , because she had already been biased with the kind of studies she chose to use . She also substantiated this conclusion with the several in the public eye(predicate) positions of several interest groups and organizations which is in upgrade of TV observe , paternal guidance and censorship , which one could say are convinced(p) because it is a reality that television shows are powerful and parents should be aware of the need to monitoring device and guide their children on what shows to bring in . Thus the report is damage because it does not take extraneous objective data from sound research , it relied heavily on secondary data and it did not provide an unbiased discussion of theReferencesBabbie , E (2004 . The Practice of social Research 10th ed . Belmont CA : WadsworthLeedy ,Ormrod , J (2005 . virtual(a) Research : Planning and expression 8th edUpper Saddle River , NJ : Pearson Prentice-HallOrcher , L (2005 . Conducting research : sociable and behavioral science methods . GlendaleCA : Pyrczak PublishingPyrczak , F Bruce , R (2005 . Writing existential research reports 3rd ed . Glendale , CAPyrczak Publishing ...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper