'Psychodynamic Personality Theories Essay\r'

' modern society is intrigued with the nonion of human deportment as it expresses itself in our ad hominemity. Psychoanalytic mouldingling is most noted for introspective strategies much(prenominal) as depth interviewing and projective techniques, which have emanated from its supposititious perspective. Classical psychoanalytic conceptualization approached the report of character source or constitution in two very different ways, for each one deriving from an early theoretical gravel of individual development. In the era of Freud’s original drive theory, an attempt was do to understand personality on the tush of fixation.\r\nLater with the development of ego psychology, character was conceived as expressing the operation of p cunningicular styles of defense. This game way of understanding character was not in conflict with the first; it provided a different set of ideas and metaphors for comprehending what was meant by a type of personality (Magnavita, 2002). The contemporary psychodynamic model of personality is very popular, particularly with clinical practitioners, and offers much that is useful for conceptualizing personality and personal disorders.\r\nThe strength of this model seems to lie in the power of many of its fundamental constructs, such as the unconscious, defense systems, and the relation among division personality structures. It is hard to imagine a psychology of personality without some reference to these and other constructs. The limitations of this model are many. Unfortunately, later years of perpetuating itself in a shut system, a crisis developed about the viability of this model.\r\n some other draw back is the tendency to shun empirical research, which would have established wider scientific acceptance. For many, the conceptualizations and esoteric language make it strong to immerse oneself in what seems a unconditional intellectualized system for those who hide behind language. In conclusion knowing where t o approximately give an individual on the structural continuum is as much a clinical art as a science. Reference Magnavita, J. J. (2002). Theories of personality: contemporary approaches to the science of personality. New York: whoremonger Wiley and Sons.\r\n'